The analysis of students’ attitudes was a subject of the research described in this paper. The research goal was determining the attitudes towards equal rights and equal distribution, capturing their changes in time, and ascertaining whether the attitudes depend on preferred values. Equal rights rule is the principle of democracy, whereas questioning egalitarianism in goods distribution is typical for liberal economics. The way of understanding values and attitudes (as well as their mutual relations) was adopted from Rokeach’s theory. They are regarded as elements of a system of beliefs, among which formal and functional relations take place. To study the system of values, the Rokeach Value Survey was used. The attitudes were diagnosed on the basis of 2 pairs of statements. Examination was conducted in 2003 (sample of 325 students), in 2008 (sample of 379 students), and in 2013 (sample of 368 students). It was assumed that there are differences between this three groups in acceptance of attitudes and that attitudes towards investigated rules depend on value systems, especially on 'individualism – collectivism' dimension. It appeared that equal chance rule was approved (by approximately 85% of respondents in the two first samples, and by approximately 65% in the third sample), whereas equal distribution rule was disapproved (by approximately 65% of respondents in all three samples). The indicator of the first atti-tude declined in the latest sample, whereas the indicator of the second attitude remained unvaried. Indicators of attitudes did not changed significantly during five year between two surveys. Individualistic orientation in value system (relatively higher preferences of individualistic values) was characteristic for students with meritocratic attitudes i.e. rejected the rule of 'equal distribution', whereas collectivist orientation (relatively higher preferences of collectivistic values) was typical for students who approved equal rights rule.
Keywords:
equal rights rule equal distribution rule value system individualism – collectivism